Intracellular localization and interaction of mRNA binding proteins as detected by FRET
Intracellular localization and interaction of mRNA binding proteins as detected by FRET
AbstractBackgroundA number of RNA binding proteins (BPs) bind to A+U rich elements (AREs), commonly present within 3'UTRs of highly regulated RNAs. Individual RNA-BPs proteins can modulate RNA stability, RNA localization, and/or translational efficiency. Although biochemical studies have demonstrated selectivity of ARE-BPs for individual RNAs, less certain is thein vivocomposition of RNA-BP multiprotein complexes and how their composition is affected by signaling events and intracellular localization. Using FRET, we previously demonstrated that two ARE-BPs, HuR and AUF1, form stable homomeric and heteromeric associations in the nucleus and cytoplasm. In the current study, we use immuno-FRET of endogenous proteins to examine the intracellular localization and interactions of HuR and AUF1 as well as KSRP, TIA-1, and Hedls. These results were compared to those obtained with their exogenously expressed, fluorescently labeled counterparts.ResultsAll ARE-BPs examined were found to colocalize and to form stable associations with selected other RNA-BPs in one or more cellular locations variably including the nucleus, cytoplasm (in general), or in stress granules or P bodies. Interestingly, FRET based interaction of the translational suppressor, TIA-1, and the decapping protein, Hedls, was found to occur at the interface of stress granules and P bodies, dynamic sites of intracellular RNA storage and/or turnover. To explore the physical interactions of RNA-BPs with ARE containing RNAs,in vitrotranscribed Cy3-labeled RNA was transfected into cells. Interestingly, Cy3-RNA was found to coalesce in P body like punctate structures and, by FRET, was found to interact with the RNA decapping proteins, Hedls and Dcp1.ConclusionsBiochemical methodologies, such as co-immunoprecipitation, and cell biological approaches such as standard confocal microscopy are useful in demonstrating the possibility of proteins and/or proteins and RNAs interacting. However, as demonstrated herein, colocalization of proteins and proteins and RNA is not always indicative of interaction. To this point, using FRET and immuno-FRET, we have demonstrated that RNA-BPs can visually colocalize without producing a FRET signal. In contrast, proteins that appear to be delimited to one or another intracellular compartment can be shown to interact when those compartments are juxtaposed.
- University of Colorado Denver United States
- Department of Pharmacology Case Western Reserve University United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center United States
- Case Western Reserve University United States
QH573-671, Methodology Article, RNA-Binding Proteins, Cell Biology, Poly(A)-Binding Proteins, Cell Line, ELAV-Like Protein 1, Protein Transport, ELAV Proteins, Cricetinae, Multiprotein Complexes, Antigens, Surface, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Animals, Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein D0, RNA, Messenger, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein D, Protein Multimerization, Cytology, 3' Untranslated Regions, Protein Binding
QH573-671, Methodology Article, RNA-Binding Proteins, Cell Biology, Poly(A)-Binding Proteins, Cell Line, ELAV-Like Protein 1, Protein Transport, ELAV Proteins, Cricetinae, Multiprotein Complexes, Antigens, Surface, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Animals, Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein D0, RNA, Messenger, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein D, Protein Multimerization, Cytology, 3' Untranslated Regions, Protein Binding
14 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 1996IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).19 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
