<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>C4d Analysis in Endomyocardial Biopsies of Heart Transplant Patients: Is There a Correlation with Hemodynamic Data?
C4d Analysis in Endomyocardial Biopsies of Heart Transplant Patients: Is There a Correlation with Hemodynamic Data?
Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard for immunologic follow-up to detect acute cellular rejection after cardiac transplantation. Conversely, protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are not well defined. Histologically, AMR is diagnosed by the presence of capillary damage associated with complement activation. The aim of this study was to correlate C4d expression of activated complement in EMB with hemodynamic compromise upon right heart catheterization.Heart transplant patients underwent hemodynamic and histologic follow-up with EMB and right heart catheterization between January 2008 and December 2009 for a total of 491 procedures. The cardiac biopsy was evaluated for acute cellular and AMR by means of the presence of the C4d complement fraction. The histologic results were compared with hemodynamic data registered during right heart catheterization.Comparison of the hemodynamic data of subjects with versus without C4d positivity showed no significant difference. Furthermore, there was no significant difference comparing patients with versus without C4d positivity in the absence of significant acute cellular rejection episodes. (C4d-/ACR- vs C4d+/ACR-). The variation of each single hemodynamic parameter from its basal value (defined as the mean value in case of C4d-/ACR-) seemed to not be influenced by the presence of C4d+.In our experience, C4d has been routinely evaluated in the majority of EMBs. We could not demonstrate a significant correlation of C4d positivity with hemodynamic compromise. These findings suggest that significant allograft dysfunction is not related to C4d positivity. Therefore, the diagnosis of AMR is difficult to establish, because allograft dysfunction is 1 of the 3 fundamental criteria.
- University of Genoa Italy
- University of Turin Italy
Adult, Graft Rejection, Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Biopsy, Hemodynamics, Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Biopsy; Cardiac Catheterization; Complement C4b; Endocardium; Female; Graft Rejection; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Hemodynamics, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Peptide Fragments, Italy, Predictive Value of Tests, Acute Disease, Complement C4b, Heart Transplantation, Humans, Female, Biomarkers, Aged, Endocardium, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Graft Rejection, Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Biopsy, Hemodynamics, Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Biopsy; Cardiac Catheterization; Complement C4b; Endocardium; Female; Graft Rejection; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Hemodynamics, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Peptide Fragments, Italy, Predictive Value of Tests, Acute Disease, Complement C4b, Heart Transplantation, Humans, Female, Biomarkers, Aged, Endocardium, Retrospective Studies
4 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).5 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
