Meta-Analyses of the Effect of <b><i>CYP1A1</i></b> and <b><i>CYP2D6</i></b> Polymorphisms on the Risk of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
doi: 10.1159/000363428
Meta-Analyses of the Effect of <b><i>CYP1A1</i></b> and <b><i>CYP2D6</i></b> Polymorphisms on the Risk of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
<b><i>Background: </i></b><i>CYP1A1</i> and <i>CYP2D6</i> are important genes encoding enzymes involved in the metabolism of toxic chemicals and carcinogens. However, inconclusive results for the association between <i>CYP1A1</i> and <i>CYP2D6</i> polymorphisms and the risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have been reported. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association of <i>CYP1A1</i> and <i>CYP2D6</i> polymorphisms with the risk of HNSCC. <b><i>Methods: </i></b>A database search yielded 19 relevant studies. 3 polymorphisms were included in the meta-analysis: <i>CYP1A1</i>, <i>CYP2D6*4</i> and <i>CYP2D6*10</i>. Random or fixed effect models were used in the analysis. <b><i>Results: </i></b>The <i>CYP1A1</i> polymorphism was associated with HNSCC (for m1m1 vs. m1m2: odds ratio (OR) = 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.030-1.542, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.025; for the recessive model: OR = 1.316, 95% CI = 1.065-1.625, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.001). The analysis showed evidence for association between the <i>CYP2D6*4</i> polymorphism and HNSCC in Asian populations; however, negative results were also observed in other models. A significant association was also observed between <i>CYP2D6*10</i> polymorphism and HNSCC risk. <b><i>Conclusions: </i></b>The current study demonstrates that the <i>CYP1A1</i> and CYP2D6 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to both development and progression of HNSCC.
- Communication University of China, Nanjing China (People's Republic of)
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2008IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).3 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
