Identification of Nonviable Genes Affecting Touch Sensitivity inCaenorhabditis elegansUsing Neuronally Enhanced Feeding RNA Interference
Identification of Nonviable Genes Affecting Touch Sensitivity inCaenorhabditis elegansUsing Neuronally Enhanced Feeding RNA Interference
AbstractCaenorhabditis elegans senses gentle touch along the body via six touch receptor neurons. Although genetic screens and microarray analyses have identified several genes needed for touch sensitivity, these methods miss pleiotropic genes that are essential for the viability, movement, or fertility of the animals. We used neuronally enhanced feeding RNA interference to screen genes that cause lethality or paralysis when mutated, and we identified 61 such genes affecting touch sensitivity, including five positive controls. We confirmed 18 genes by using available alleles, and further studied one of them, tag-170, now renamed txdc-9. txdc-9 preferentially affects anterior touch response but is needed for tubulin acetylation and microtubule formation in both the anterior and posterior touch receptor neurons. Our results indicate that neuronally enhanced feeding RNA interference screens complement traditional mutageneses by identifying additional nonviable genes needed for specific neuronal functions.
- Columbia University United States
- King’s University United States
Touch, Mutant Screen Report, Animals, RNA Interference, Caenorhabditis elegans, Mechanoreceptors, Microtubules, Genes, Helminth
Touch, Mutant Screen Report, Animals, RNA Interference, Caenorhabditis elegans, Mechanoreceptors, Microtubules, Genes, Helminth
7 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).9 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
