Proteolytic Instability and the Action of Nonclassical Transcriptional Activators
Proteolytic Instability and the Action of Nonclassical Transcriptional Activators
Several transcriptional activators, called "classical" because each bears a natural acidic activating region attached to a DNA binding domain, are proteolytically unstable in yeast, and it has been suggested that this instability is required for transcriptional activation. Here we test the generality of that proposal by examining a set of activators (called "nonclassical") that lack activating regions. These activators (e.g., LexA-Gal11) comprise a LexA DNA binding domain fused to a component of the Mediator and are believed to insert the latter into the Mediator and recruit it (and, indirectly, other components required for transcription) to a gene bearing LexA sites. We find that three, and only three, Mediator subunits, all from its tail domain, work as activators when fused to LexA. All three are unstable, and for the case analyzed in detail, stabilization decreases activity. Thus, to the extent tested, both classical and nonclassical activators work most efficiently when proteolytically unstable.
- Kettering University United States
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research Singapore
- Biomedical Research Council Singapore
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center United States
- Genome Institute of Singapore Singapore
Transcriptional Activation, Binding Sites, Mediator Complex, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all), Saccharomyces cerevisiae, beta-Galactosidase, Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA, Cycloheximide, Transcription Factors
Transcriptional Activation, Binding Sites, Mediator Complex, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all), Saccharomyces cerevisiae, beta-Galactosidase, Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA, Cycloheximide, Transcription Factors
18 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).21 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
