Physicians’ perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports for cystic fibrosis (ΔF508) and factor V Leiden
pmid: 12792424
Physicians’ perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports for cystic fibrosis (ΔF508) and factor V Leiden
We sought to determine whether variation in test-report content for cystic fibrosis (CF DeltaF508) and factor V Leiden (fVL) would impact physician-perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports.A cross-sectional survey of US physicians from specialties likely to order the tests was performed. Physicians received an introductory letter with a clinical scenario, one randomly assigned mock report, and a one-page survey. The analyses evaluated usefulness of and satisfaction with report elements.For CF and fVL, there were significant differences by mock-report version for most of the survey report items (P 0.70) with satisfaction were (1.clinical decision-making information, (2). genetic counseling information, and (3). implications for family members.Opportunities exist to improve the usefulness of genetic test reports in clinical practice.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention United States
- University of Health Sciences Somalia
- Tulane University United States
Cross-Sectional Studies, Cystic Fibrosis, Attitude of Health Personnel, Genetic Services, Physicians, Factor V, Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies, Cystic Fibrosis, Attitude of Health Personnel, Genetic Services, Physicians, Factor V, Humans
78 Research products, page 1 of 8
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).17 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
