Powered by OpenAIRE graph

Physicians’ perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports for cystic fibrosis (ΔF508) and factor V Leiden

Authors: Marie, Krousel-Wood; Hans C, Andersson; Janet, Rice; Kelly E, Jackson; Eunice R, Rosner; Ira M, Lubin;

Physicians’ perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports for cystic fibrosis (ΔF508) and factor V Leiden

Abstract

We sought to determine whether variation in test-report content for cystic fibrosis (CF DeltaF508) and factor V Leiden (fVL) would impact physician-perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports.A cross-sectional survey of US physicians from specialties likely to order the tests was performed. Physicians received an introductory letter with a clinical scenario, one randomly assigned mock report, and a one-page survey. The analyses evaluated usefulness of and satisfaction with report elements.For CF and fVL, there were significant differences by mock-report version for most of the survey report items (P 0.70) with satisfaction were (1.clinical decision-making information, (2). genetic counseling information, and (3). implications for family members.Opportunities exist to improve the usefulness of genetic test reports in clinical practice.

Keywords

Cross-Sectional Studies, Cystic Fibrosis, Attitude of Health Personnel, Genetic Services, Physicians, Factor V, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Average