Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Human Pathologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Human Pathology
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Distinguishing Barrett gastric foveolar dysplasia from reactive cardiac mucosa in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Authors: Deepa T, Patil; Ana E, Bennett; Dipti, Mahajan; Mary P, Bronner;

Distinguishing Barrett gastric foveolar dysplasia from reactive cardiac mucosa in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Abstract

Morphologic dysplasia remains the criterion standard of cancer risk in Barrett esophagus but poses many challenges including distinction from reactive inflammatory change. Gastric foveolar dysplasia, a newly described subtype comprising 15% to 20% of Barrett dysplasia, overlaps with reactive cardiac mucosa in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Despite the clinical importance of accurate distinction, the issue has not been studied. Review of 3698 biopsies from 461 Barrett patients yielded 160 biopsies with Barrett gastric foveolar dysplasia (74 low grade and 86 high grade). These were compared with inflamed cardia from 80 patients with GERD. Immunohistochemistry was performed for Lgl2, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6. Comparing GERD with Barrett gastric foveolar dysplasia, surface nuclear stratification (85% versus 0%, P < .00001), upper mucosa-limited atypia (80% versus 0%, P < .0001), villiform architecture (52% versus 4%; P < .0001), full-thickness mucosal atypia (0% versus 100%, P < .00001), and crowded glandular architecture (0% versus 75%, P < .00001) all proved useful. Cytologic features were less helpful. Comparing low-grade gastric dysplasia alone, because its distinction from reactive cardia may be even more challenging, the listed features all remained significant. Loss or aberrant Lgl2 expression was much more typical of dysplasia (12% versus 99%; P = .0001). MUC proteins did not distinguish the groups. Surface nuclear stratification, "top-heavy" atypia, and noncrowded, villiform architecture were highly characteristic of reactive cardiac atypia in GERD, in comparison with the monolayered nuclei in crowded glands occupying the full mucosal thickness in Barrett gastric foveolar dysplasia. Loss or aberrant Lgl2 staining was useful in identifying Barrett gastric foveolar dysplasia.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Inflammation, Male, Mucins, Cardia, Middle Aged, beta Karyopherins, Immunohistochemistry, Diagnosis, Differential, Barrett Esophagus, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Biomarkers, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%