Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal Of Clinical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Clinical risk factors associated with incidence and progression of periodontal conditions in pregnant women

Authors: Kevin L, Moss; James D, Beck; Steven, Offenbacher;

Clinical risk factors associated with incidence and progression of periodontal conditions in pregnant women

Abstract

AbstractObjectives: Few large studies have investigated the progression of periodontal conditions during pregnancy in a comprehensive manner. This study aimed to identify clinical factors that were predictive of incidence/progression of periodontal measures in pregnant women adjusting for relevant predictors.Material and Methods: Periodontal examinations were conducted on 891 pregnant women prior to 26 weeks gestational age and within 48 h after delivery. Gingivitis/periodontitis incidence/progression (GPIP) was defined as four plus sites with 2+ mm increase in probing depth (PD) that resulted in PD of at least 4 mm at delivery. Multivariable models including relevant clinical variables and significant covariates were developed.Results: While several clinical measures were significantly associated with the outcome, having 10% of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP) and four plus sites with PD 4 mm (PD4) were the best two predictors of GPIP (odds ratio (OR)=2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.8–4.2; OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.4–2.9, respectively), adjusting for maternal race, age, enrollment weight, smoking during pregnancy, marital status, food stamp eligibility, and private health insurance. Multivariable models assessed the impact of BOP on the PD4–GPIP relationship. PD4 was significant in the presence of BOP (low BOP OR=1.3, 95% CI=0.5–3.3; high BOP OR=3.0, 95% CI=2.2–4.3).Conclusions: Enrollment BOP and PD4 were significant predictors of PD in pregnant women, however; PD4 is only a predictor with BOP.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Analysis of Variance, Adolescent, Incidence, Middle Aged, Gingivitis, United States, Pregnancy Complications, Logistic Models, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Disease Progression, Ethnicity, Humans, Female, Periodontal Index, Periodontitis, Demography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    54
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
54
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%