Codon Usage Bias and tRNA Abundance in Drosophila
doi: 10.1007/pl00006256
pmid: 9342399
Codon Usage Bias and tRNA Abundance in Drosophila
Codon usage bias of 1,117 Drosophila melanogaster genes, as well as fewer D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis genes, was examined from the perspective of relative abundance of isoaccepting tRNAs and their changes during development. We found that each amino acid contributes about equally and highly significantly to overall codon usage bias, with the exception of Asp which had very low contribution to overall bias. Asp was also the only amino acid that did not show a clear preference for one of its synonymous codons. Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila was consistent with "optimal" codons deduced from the isoaccepting tRNA availability. Interestingly, amino acids whose major isoaccepting tRNAs change during development did not show as strong bias as those with developmentally unchanged tRNA pools. Asp is the only amino acid for which the major isoaccepting tRNAs change between larval and adult stages. We conclude that synonymous codon usage in Drosophila is well explained by tRNA availability and is probably influenced by developmental changes in relative abundance.
- Yale University United States
Models, Genetic, RNA, Transfer, Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Drosophila, Genes, Insect, Amino Acids, Codon, Biological Evolution
Models, Genetic, RNA, Transfer, Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Drosophila, Genes, Insect, Amino Acids, Codon, Biological Evolution
609 Research products, page 1 of 61
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).291 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
