Powered by OpenAIRE graph

Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Lack of KIT Positivity and Implications for the Use of Imatinib Mesylate
Authors: Qinghong, Yang; Jason L, Hornick; Scott R, Granter; Linda C, Wang;
Abstract

The large variability (7% to 100%) in previously reported rates of receptor tyrosine kinase KIT expression in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) may be owing to the use of heat-induced epitope retrieval. High frequency of reported KIT reactivity by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in part prompted the initiation of a phase 2 clinical trial of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) for the treatment of advanced MCC. Our experience has been that a small number of MCCs (12.5%) are positive for KIT by IHC. We also found a higher rate of apparently KIT-positive MCCs (75%) using heat-induced epitope retrieval. Our anecdotal experience with the use of imatinib mesylate has been disappointing. As IHC detection of KIT expression does not correlate with the presence of KIT-activating mutations, protein expression as tested by IHC should not be used to determine if patients would respond to imatinib mesylate. Indeed, our review of the literature and the apparent lack of efficacy of imatinib mesylate for MCC in a recent phase 2 trial suggest a minor role for KIT signaling in MCC tumorigenesis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Piperazines, Carcinoma, Merkel Cell, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit, Pyrimidines, Benzamides, Imatinib Mesylate, Humans, Female, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average