Contamination and sample mix-up can best explain some patterns of mtDNA instabilities in buccal cells and oral squamous cell carcinoma
Contamination and sample mix-up can best explain some patterns of mtDNA instabilities in buccal cells and oral squamous cell carcinoma
The study of somatic DNA instabilities constitutes a debatable topic because different causes can lead to seeming DNA alteration patterns between different cells or tissues from the same individual. Carcinogenesis or the action of a particular toxic could generate such patterns, and this is in fact the leitmotif of a number of studies on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) instability. Patterns of seeming instabilities could also arise from technical errors at any stage of the analysis (DNA extraction, amplification, mutation screening/sequencing, and documentation). Specifically, inadvertent DNA contamination or sample mixing would yield mosaic variation that could be erroneously interpreted as real mutation differences (instabilities) between tissues from the same individual. From the very beginning, mtDNA studies comparing cancerous to non-cancerous tissues have suffered from such mosaic results. We demonstrate here that the phylogenetic linkage of whole arrays of mtDNA mutations provides strong evidence of artificial recombination in previous studies on buccal cells and oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Cancer Research, DNA Mutational Analysis, Smoking, Mouth Mucosa, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, Reproducibility of Results, DNA, Mitochondrial, Oncology, Correspondence, Mutation, Genetics, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Mouth Neoplasms, Artifacts, RC254-282, Phylogeny
Cancer Research, DNA Mutational Analysis, Smoking, Mouth Mucosa, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, Reproducibility of Results, DNA, Mitochondrial, Oncology, Correspondence, Mutation, Genetics, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Mouth Neoplasms, Artifacts, RC254-282, Phylogeny
6 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2011IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2011IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).46 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
