Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Bonearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Bone
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Bone
Article . 2004
versions View all 2 versions

A selective EP4 receptor antagonist abrogates the stimulation of osteoblast recruitment from bone marrow stromal cells by prostaglandin E2 in vivo and in vitro

Authors: D, Shamir; S, Keila; M, Weinreb;

A selective EP4 receptor antagonist abrogates the stimulation of osteoblast recruitment from bone marrow stromal cells by prostaglandin E2 in vivo and in vitro

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that systemic administration of PGE2 increases bone formation and bone mass via activation of the EP4 receptor. Previously, we demonstrated that osteoblastic recruitment from rat bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) is a major mechanism for the anabolic effect of PGE2. In this study, we used a selective EP4 antagonist to test if the stimulation of osteoblast differentiation from rat BMSC in vitro and in vivo involves the EP4 receptor. In vitro, PGE2 (100 nM) increased nodule formation and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in cultures of rat BMSC 1.5- to 2-fold. These effects were abolished by the EP4 antagonist at 10(-6) M but not 10(-9) M. Furthermore, PGE2 increased the number of surviving adherent BMSC by approximately 225% and the EP4 antagonist prevented this effect as well. The antagonist had no effect on basal levels of nodule formation and adherent cell number. In vivo, daily systemic administration of PGE2 at 6 mg/kg for 2 weeks increased cancellous bone area (by approximately 50%) and increased nodule formation (measured as mineralized area) in ex vivo stromal cultures by approximately 50%. Pre-administration of the EP4 antagonist at 10 mg/kg abrogated both the increase in bone mass as well as the increase in nodule formation. These data indicate that PGE2 stimulates osteoblastic commitment of BMSC via activation of the EP4 receptor.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Osteoblasts, Cell Differentiation, Alkaline Phosphatase, Bone and Bones, Dinoprostone, Rats, Enzyme Activation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Bone Marrow, Cell Adhesion, Animals, Receptors, Prostaglandin E, Stromal Cells, Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    55
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
55
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%