Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Journal of Clini...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Effect of 393T>C Polymorphism of GNAS1 Gene on Dobutamine Response in Chinese Healthy Subjects

Authors: Yan-Mei, Mao; Zhao-Qian, Liu; Bi-Lian, Chen; Dong, Guo; Chun-Ting, Han; Li-Jun, Yang; Sai-Ying, Wang; +2 Authors

Effect of 393T>C Polymorphism of GNAS1 Gene on Dobutamine Response in Chinese Healthy Subjects

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize the functional consequences of the 393T>C polymorphism of the GNAS1 gene in vivo. PCR‐RFLP assays were used to identifyGNAS1andβ1‐adrenoceptor genotypes. The heart rate (HR), blood pressure, left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were determined in different genotypes through a modified dobutamine stress echocardiography protocol. Our results showed that individuals with homozygous or heterozygous C393 had an increased cardiovascular agonistic response to dobutamine, and the increases from baseline in LVFS at the 3 dosage levels of dobutamine were 19.3% ± 1.0% versus 32.0% ± 2.9%, 36.7% ± 3.1% versus 41.3% ± 4.1%, and 51.7% ± 3.3% versus 58.7% ± 2.6% in T393 homozygotes and C393 homozygotes or heterozygotes, respectively(P =.026). Significant differences were also found between these 2 groups with the increases from baseline in LVEF(P =.007) and SBP(P =.048). In addition, there were significant differences in the increases from atopine in LVFS(P =.011), LVEF(P =.004), and SBP(P =.046) between the T393 homozygotes and C393 homozygotes or heterozygotes. The change of LVEF in C393 homozygous was higher than that in T393 homozygous at the dose of 40 μg/kg/min (28.9% ± 4.0% vs 36.4% ± 2.1%; 95% CI, 18.8%‐38.9%;P =.046). These data suggested that the 393T>C polymorphism of GNAS1 was functionally relevant in vivo.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, China, Polymorphism, Genetic, Adolescent, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Genotype, Blood Pressure, Adrenergic beta-Agonists, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Double-Blind Method, Heart Rate, Dobutamine, Chromogranins, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs, Humans, Female, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-1, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Echocardiography, Stress

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Average
Average