Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Prenatal Diagnosisarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Prenatal Diagnosis
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

First trimester screening for Down syndrome using nuchal translucency, maternal serum pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A, free‐β human chorionic gonadotrophin, placental growth factor, and α‐fetoprotein

Authors: Tianhua, Huang; Alan, Dennis; Wendy S, Meschino; Shamim, Rashid; Ellen, Mak-Tam; Howard, Cuckle;

First trimester screening for Down syndrome using nuchal translucency, maternal serum pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A, free‐β human chorionic gonadotrophin, placental growth factor, and α‐fetoprotein

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the screening performance for Down syndrome using first trimester combined screening (FTS) and two additional markers, serum placental growth factor (PlGF) and α‐fetoprotein (AFP).MethodsThis is a retrospective case‐control study of 137 pregnancies affected by Down syndrome and 684 individually matched unaffected pregnancies. Stored serum samples were tested for all four markers, and results were expressed as multiples of the gestation‐specific median (MoM). Multivariate Gaussian modeling was used to calculate risks for different combinations of markers and to predict the detection rate (DR) and false positive rate (FPR). The predicted performance of enhanced FTS (FTS plus PlGF and AFP) was compared with FTS; the performance without nuchal translucency (first trimester quad) was assessed.ResultsFor affected pregnancies, the median PlGF level was 0.622 MoM and median AFP 0.764 MoM. Adding PlGF and AFP improved the screening performance. At 3% FPR, DR increased by 4.4% from 83.8% to 88.2% using enhanced FTS; at 95% DR, FPR decreased by 8.3%, from 19.3% to 11.0%. At 3% FPR, DR using first trimester quad test was 76.4%.ConclusionsThe performance of FTS can be enhanced by adding PlGF and AFP. Even without nuchal translucency, the test would perform well. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

Adult, Models, Statistical, Normal Distribution, Pregnancy Proteins, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy, Case-Control Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Humans, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A, Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human, False Positive Reactions, Female, alpha-Fetoproteins, Down Syndrome, Nuchal Translucency Measurement, Biomarkers, Maternal Serum Screening Tests, Placenta Growth Factor, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    44
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
44
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%