Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ LUMC Scholarly Publi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 6 versions

Third trimester screening for alloimmunisation in Rhc‐negative pregnant women: evaluation of the Dutch national screening programme

evaluation of the Dutch national screening programme
Authors: Slootweg, Y.M.; Koelewijn, J.M.; Kamp, I.L. van; Bom, J.G. van der; Oepkes, D.; Haas, M. de;

Third trimester screening for alloimmunisation in Rhc‐negative pregnant women: evaluation of the Dutch national screening programme

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of red blood cell (RBC) antibody screening in the 27th week of pregnancy in Rhc‐negative women, on detection of alloimmunisation, undetected at first trimester screening (‘late’ alloimmunisation), and subsequent haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), to assess risk factors for late alloimmunisation.DesignProspective cohort and nested case–control study.SettingThe Netherlands.PopulationTwo‐year nationwide cohort.MethodsProspective inclusion of Rhc‐negative women with negative first trimester screening and of screen‐negative controls. Assessment of incidence and numbers needed to screen (NNS) of late alloimmunisation and HDFN; logistic regression analysis to establish risk factors for late alloimmunisation.Main outcome measuresLate alloimmunisation, HDFN.ResultsLate alloimmunisation occurred in 99 of 62 096 (0.159%) Rhc‐negative women; 90% had c/E antibodies and 10% non‐Rhesus antibodies. Severe HDFN (fetal/neonatal transfusion) occurred in two of 62 096 (0.003%) of Rhc‐negative women and 2% of late alloimmunisations; moderate HDFN (phototherapy) occurred in 20 children [22.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 13.8–31.1%]. Perinatal survival was 100%. The NNS to detect one HDFN case was 2823 (31 048 for severe, 3105 for moderate HDFN). Significant risk factors were former blood transfusion [odds ratio (OR), 10.4; 95% CI, 1.14–94.9], parity (P−1: OR, 11.8; 95% CI, 3.00–46.5; P > 1: OR, 7.77; 95% CI, 1.70–35.4) and amniocentesis/chorionic villus sampling during current pregnancy (OR, 9.20; 95% CI, 1.16–72.9).ConclusionsAdditional screening of Rhc‐negative women improved the detection of late alloimmunisation and HDFN, facilitating timely treatment, with a NNS of 2823. Independent risk factors for late alloimmunisation were blood transfusion, parity and chorionic villus sampling/amniocentesis in the current pregnancy. The occurrence of most factors before the current pregnancy suggests a secondary immune response explaining most late alloimmunisations.Tweetable abstractThird trimester screening for alloimmunisation in Rhc‐neg women improves detection and treatment of severe HDFN.

Keywords

FETUS, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, RHESUS-D, Rhc-negative, RED-CELL ALLOIMMUNIZATION, FETAL ANEMIA, Rh Isoimmunization, Severity of Illness Index, Erythroblastosis, Fetal, Alloimmunisation, incidences, Isoantibodies, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, MANAGEMENT, risk factors, Humans, Mass Screening, Blood Transfusion, Netherlands, Rh-Hr Blood-Group System, screening, Incidence, Infant, Newborn, HEMOLYTIC-DISEASE, Survival Rate, Parity, Chorionic Villi Sampling, ANTIBODIES, RISK-FACTORS, Amniocentesis, POSITIVE WOMEN, Female, NEWBORN, Program Evaluation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Green
hybrid