Quantification of mitochondrial morphology in neurites of dopaminergic neurons using multiple parameters
Quantification of mitochondrial morphology in neurites of dopaminergic neurons using multiple parameters
Studies of mitochondrial morphology vary in techniques. Most use one morphological parameter while others describe mitochondria qualitatively. Because mitochondria are so dynamic, a single parameter does not capture the true state of the network and may lead to erroneous conclusions. Thus, a gestalt method of analysis is warranted.This work describes a method combining immunofluorescence assays with computerized image analysis to measure the mitochondrial morphology within neuritic projections of a specific population of neurons. Six parameters of mitochondrial morphology were examined utilizing ImageJ to analyze colocalized signals.Using primary neuronal cultures from Drosophila, we tested mitochondrial morphology in neurites of dopaminergic (DA) neurons. We validate our model using mutants with known defects in mitochondrial morphology. Furthermore, we show a difference in mitochondrial morphology between cells treated as control or with a neurotoxin inducing PD (Parkinson's Disease in humans)-like pathology. We also show interactions between morphological parameters and experimental treatment.Our method is a significant improvement of previously described methods. Six morphometric parameters are quantified, providing a gestalt analysis of mitochondrial morphology. Also it can target specific populations of mitochondria using immunofluorescence assay and image analysis.We found that our method adequately detects differences in mitochondrial morphology between treatment groups. We conclude that some parameters may be unique to a mutation or a disease state, and the relationship between parameters is altered by experimental treatment. We suggest at least four variables should be considered when using mitochondrial structure as an experimental endpoint.
- Uppsala University Sweden
- Ohio University United States
- Ohio University - Lancaster United States
Principal Component Analysis, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Dopaminergic Neurons, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Statistics as Topic, Membrane Proteins, Mitochondria, Animals, Genetically Modified, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Animals, Newborn, GTP-Binding Proteins, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neurites, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Drosophila, Cells, Cultured
Principal Component Analysis, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Dopaminergic Neurons, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Statistics as Topic, Membrane Proteins, Mitochondria, Animals, Genetically Modified, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Animals, Newborn, GTP-Binding Proteins, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neurites, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Drosophila, Cells, Cultured
8 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).120 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
