Peripheral Coding of Taste
Peripheral Coding of Taste
Five canonical tastes, bitter, sweet, umami (amino acid), salty, and sour (acid), are detected by animals as diverse as fruit flies and humans, consistent with a near-universal drive to consume fundamental nutrients and to avoid toxins or other harmful compounds. Surprisingly, despite this strong conservation of basic taste qualities between vertebrates and invertebrates, the receptors and signaling mechanisms that mediate taste in each are highly divergent. The identification over the last two decades of receptors and other molecules that mediate taste has led to stunning advances in our understanding of the basic mechanisms of transduction and coding of information by the gustatory systems of vertebrates and invertebrates. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in taste research, mainly from the fly and mammalian systems, and we highlight principles that are common across species, despite stark differences in receptor types.
- University of California, Santa Barbara United States
- University of California System United States
- University of Southern California United States
- University of California, San Francisco United States
Neurology & Neurosurgery, Neuroscience(all), Neurosciences, Taste Perception, Taste Buds, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, G-Protein-Coupled, Taste, Receptors, Psychology, Animals, Humans, Cognitive Sciences, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Nutrition, Signal Transduction
Neurology & Neurosurgery, Neuroscience(all), Neurosciences, Taste Perception, Taste Buds, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, G-Protein-Coupled, Taste, Receptors, Psychology, Animals, Humans, Cognitive Sciences, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Nutrition, Signal Transduction
32 Research products, page 1 of 4
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).390 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
