Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Engineering Research...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao

Multi-response optimization of magnetic abrasive finishing for AZ-31 alloy using RSM-GRA approach

Authors: Rajesh Babbar; Aviral Misra;

Multi-response optimization of magnetic abrasive finishing for AZ-31 alloy using RSM-GRA approach

Abstract

Abstract A magnetic abrasive finishing is a non-traditional technology utilizes a flexible magnetic abrasive brush comprises of magnetic abrasive particles under the influence of the magnetic field to perform nano-finishing. The material removal (MR) and percentage change in surface roughness (%āˆ†R a ) are responses governing the efficiency of the finishing process. But, a high material removal during the finishing operation leads to the loss in form/shape of the finished surface. A compromise has to be made considering the two responses for an optimized finishing operation. In this work, a multi-response optimization was executed using grey relation analysis (GRA). The objective functions considered are to maximize %āˆ†R a and minimize MR. The experiments were designed and conducted using response surface methodology. The workpiece material was taken as AZ-31 alloy. The optimized conditions observed were %āˆ†R a as 67.43% and MR as 63 mg at the working gap of 2 mm, rotational speed of 600 rpm, voltage of 18 volts and abrasive particle mesh number of 400 mesh. The GRA also reveals that the working gap has the strongest influence on the finishing considering both responses concurrently. The ANOVA analysis was also executed to analyze the significant interaction effects of process parameters on output responses.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%