Powered by OpenAIRE graph

Multi-omics Comparison among Populations of Three Plant Sources of Amomi Fructus

Authors: Xinlian Chen; Shichao Sun; Xiaoxu Han; Cheng Li; Bao Nie; Zhuangwei Hou; Jiaojiao Ji; +5 Authors

Multi-omics Comparison among Populations of Three Plant Sources of Amomi Fructus

Abstract

ABSTRACTAmomi Fructus (Sharen, AF) is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) from three source species (or subspecies) includingWurfbainia villosavar.villosa(WVV),W. villosavar.xanthioides(WVX) orW. longiligularis(WL). Among them, WVV has been transplanted from its top-geoherb region Guangdong to its current main production area Yunnan for more than 50 years in China. However, the genetic and transcriptomic differentiation among multiple AF source (sub)species and between the origin and transplanted populations of WVV is unknown. In our study, the observed overall higher expression of terpenoid biosynthesis genes in WVV than that of WVX supplied possible evidence for the better pharmacological effect of WVV. We also screened ten candidateborneol dehydrogenase(BDH) genes that potentially catalyzed borneol into camphor in WVV. TheBDHgenes may experience independent evolution after acquiring the ancestral copies and the followed tandem duplications might account for the abundant camphor content in WVV. Furthermore, four populations of WVV, WVX and WL are genetically differentiated and the gene flow from WVX to WVV in Yunnan contributed to the increased genetic diversity in the introduced population (WVV-JH) compared to its top-geoherb region (WVV-YC), which showed the lowest genetic diversity and might undergo genetic degradation. In addition,TPSandBDHgenes were selected among populations of multiple AF source (sub)species and between the top-geoherb and non-top-geoherb regions, which might explain the metabolite difference of these populations. Our findings provide important guidance for the conservation, genetic improvement, industrial development of the three source (sub)species, and identifying top-geoherbalism with molecular markers and proper clinical application of AF.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average