Powered by OpenAIRE graph

[Evaluation of laryngeal masks].

Authors: F, Sorba; P, Courrèges; D, Lecoutre; R, Bayard-Gary;
Abstract

The size 1 laryngeal mask (LMA1) was studied prospectively in a series of 37 infants (weight less than 6.5 kg) undergoing 42 routine surgical procedures. LMA1 insertion was successful at first attempt in 80.9% of all cases and a good airway control was obtained in 93%. The most frequent cause of insertion failure was an insufficient depth of anaesthesia. Only one incident occurred peroperatively. The recovery incidents rate, higher than in other studies, was mainly due to the laryngeal hyperreactivity of infants. LMA1 provides high safety for infant anaesthesia woith food working conditions for bot anaesthetist and surgeon. However, an accurate determination of the anaesthesia level and a close monitoring of recovery are strongly recommended.

Keywords

Intraoperative Period, Equipment Safety, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Infant, Prospective Studies, Laryngeal Masks

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average