Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Romanian Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/

Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein as a prognostic indicator in prostate carcinoma.

Authors: Amelia, Petrescu; Liliana, Mârzan; O, Codreanu; L, Niculescu;

Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein as a prognostic indicator in prostate carcinoma.

Abstract

THE AIM of our study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of p53 protein immunoreactivity for prostate cancer and to determine whether p53 immunoreactivity correlates with the Gleason tumor grade in primary adenocarcinoma. Prostate fragments were fixed in 10% formalin, paraffin-embedded, sectioned and standard Hematoxylin-Eosin stained, then examined using histological grade (Gleason system). P53 expression was studied using immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibody anti-p53, 1 : 100 (BIOX) on tissue samples obtained during transurethral electroresection, adenomectomy or needle biopsy in 30 patients with prostate carcinoma: group 1 (n = 7) Gleason score 5, group 2 (n = 10) Gleason score 6, group 3 (n = 11) Gleason score 7, group 4 (n = 2) Gleason score 8. Also, we noted the cases with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (high grade PIN). All specimens prior to initiation of any treatment were submitted for this study. Staining was defined as positive for p53 whenever any specific nuclear staining was detected. We considered tumors to overexpress p53 protein only when strong nuclear staining was present. Cases exhibiting weak or equivocal nuclear staining were classified as negative, as were cases with extremely rare isolated positive nuclei. A semiquantitative scoring system was employed to assess the level of p53 reactivity. Six of 17 (35.2%) moderately differentiated tumors (Gleason score 5-6) and five of 13 (38.4%) moderate to poorly differentiated (Gleason score 7 and above) revealed strong nuclear positivity for p53. In addition, we noted occasional p53 reactivity in high-grade PIN.We interpret these data to demonstrate a positive association between p53 reactivity and higher Gleason grade tumors; p53 might be an independent prognostic indicator among metastatic risk cases.

Keywords

Male, Humans, Prostatic Neoplasms, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Prognosis, Immunohistochemistry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research