LIMITING FACTORS IN SINGLE PARTICLE CRYO ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY
LIMITING FACTORS IN SINGLE PARTICLE CRYO ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY
Modern methods of cryo electron microscopy and tomography allow visualization of protein nanomachines in their native state at the nanometer scale. Image processing methods including sub-volume averaging applied to repeating macromolecular elements within tomograms allow exploring their structures within the native context of the cell, avoiding the need for protein isolation and purification. Today, many different data acquisition protocols and software solutions are available to researchers to determine average structures of macromolecular complexes and potentially to classify structural intermediates. Here, we list the density maps reported in the literature, and analyze each structure for the chosen instrumental settings, sample conditions, main processing steps, and obtained resolution. We present conclusions that identify factors currently limiting the resolution gained by this approach.
- University of Basel Switzerland
- University of Zurich Switzerland
Cancer Research, 1303 Biochemistry, SX20 Research, Technology and Development Projects, Mini Review, 1315 Structural Biology, SX00 SystemsX.ch, 1311 Genetics, SX03 CINA, 1305 Biotechnology, 1706 Computer Science Applications, 570 Life sciences; biology, TP248.13-248.65, 1304 Biophysics, Biotechnology
Cancer Research, 1303 Biochemistry, SX20 Research, Technology and Development Projects, Mini Review, 1315 Structural Biology, SX00 SystemsX.ch, 1311 Genetics, SX03 CINA, 1305 Biotechnology, 1706 Computer Science Applications, 570 Life sciences; biology, TP248.13-248.65, 1304 Biophysics, Biotechnology
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).29 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
