A Comparative Study of Systems Pharmacology and Gene Chip Technology for Predicting Targets of a Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula in Primary Liver Cancer Treatment
A Comparative Study of Systems Pharmacology and Gene Chip Technology for Predicting Targets of a Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula in Primary Liver Cancer Treatment
Background: The systems pharmacology approach is a target prediction model for traditional Chinese medicine and has been used increasingly in recent years. However, the accuracy of this model to other prediction models is yet to be established.Objective: To compare the systems pharmacology modelwithexperimental gene chip technology by using these models to predict targets of a traditional Chinese medicine formulain the treatment of primary liver cancer.Methods: Systems pharmacology and gene chip target predictions were performed for the traditional Chinese medicine formula ZhenzhuXiaojiTang (ZZXJT). A third square alignment was performed with molecular docking.Results: Identification of systems pharmacology accounted for 17% of targets, whilegene chip-predicted outcomes accounted for 19%.Molecular docking showed that the top ten targets (excludingcommon targets) of the system pharmacology model had better binding free energies than the gene chip model using twocommon targets as a benchmark. For both models, the core drugs predictions were more consistent than the core small molecules predictions.Conclusion:In this study, the identified targets of systems pharmacology weredissimilar to those identified by gene chip technology; whereas the core drug and small molecule predictions were similar.
liver cancer, Pharmacology, ZZXJT, gene chip, molecular docking, drug target prediction comparing TCM target prediction models 2, Therapeutics. Pharmacology, RM1-950, systems pharmacology
liver cancer, Pharmacology, ZZXJT, gene chip, molecular docking, drug target prediction comparing TCM target prediction models 2, Therapeutics. Pharmacology, RM1-950, systems pharmacology
43 Research products, page 1 of 5
- 2015IsRelatedTo
- 2022IsRelatedTo
- 1997IsRelatedTo
- 2009IsRelatedTo
- 1995IsRelatedTo
- 2014IsRelatedTo
- 2013IsRelatedTo
- 2019IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
chevron_right
35 bioentities, page 1 of 2
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).6 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
