<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A Review of Fatigue Crack Growth Thresholds for Metals in Fitness-for-Service Codes: On the Uncertainty of Using the Thresholds at Negative Stress Ratios

doi: 10.1115/1.4050773
A Review of Fatigue Crack Growth Thresholds for Metals in Fitness-for-Service Codes: On the Uncertainty of Using the Thresholds at Negative Stress Ratios
Abstract Fatigue crack growth thresholds ΔKth for metals are provided in many fitness-for-service codes. However, fatigue crack growth thresholds at negative stress ratios are not consistently defined. There are two forms of thresholds at negative stress ratios: constant thresholds irrespective of stress ratios, or increasing thresholds with decreasing stress ratios. The definitions of the thresholds at negative stress ratios also take two forms: either ΔKth = Kmax−Kmin, or ΔKth = Kmax. ASME Section VIII, Section XI (ferritic steel) and International Institute of Welding (IIW) give constant thresholds expressed by ΔKth = Kmax. American Petroleum Institute (API) 579 and ASME Section XI (stainless steel) give increases in thresholds with decreasing stress ratios and the thresholds are expressed by ΔKth = Kmax−Kmin. British Standard (BS) 7910 gives constant thresholds expressed by ΔKth = Kmax−Kmin. The fatigue crack growth thresholds differ significantly among different fitness-for-service (FFS) codes. Appropriate thresholds for ferritic steels, stainless steels, and aluminum alloys are demonstrated in the literature survey.
- Hitachi (Japan) Japan
- Technical University of Ostrava Czech Republic
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average