Asymmetric Sequence Divergence of Duplicate Genes
Asymmetric Sequence Divergence of Duplicate Genes
Much like humans, gene duplicates may be created equal, but they do not stay that way for long. For four completely sequenced genomes we show that 20%–30% of duplicate gene pairs show asymmetric evolution in the amino acid sequence of their protein products. That is, one of the duplicates evolves much faster than the other. The greater this asymmetry, the greater the ratio Ka/Ks of amino acid substitutions (Ka) to silent substitutions (Ks) in a gene pair. This indicates that most asymmetric divergence may be caused by relaxed selective constraints on one of the duplicates. However, we also find some candidate duplicates where positive (directional) selection of beneficial mutations (Ka/Ks > 1) may play a role in asymmetric divergence. Our analysis rests on a codon-based model of molecular evolution that allows a test for asymmetric divergence in Ka. The method is also more sensitive in detecting positive selection (Ka/Ks > 1) than models relying only on pairwise gene comparisons.
- University of New Mexico United States
Gene Expression Profiling, Computational Biology, Genetic Variation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Evolution, Molecular, Drosophila melanogaster, Amino Acid Substitution, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Duplicate, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Schizosaccharomyces, Animals, Caenorhabditis elegans
Gene Expression Profiling, Computational Biology, Genetic Variation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Evolution, Molecular, Drosophila melanogaster, Amino Acid Substitution, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Duplicate, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Schizosaccharomyces, Animals, Caenorhabditis elegans
49 Research products, page 1 of 5
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).200 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
