<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Gene editing can generate fragile bivalents in mouse oocytes
doi: 10.1101/350272
Gene editing can generate fragile bivalents in mouse oocytes
AbstractMouse female meiotic spindles assemble from acentriolar MTOCs (aMTOCs) that fragment into discrete foci. These are further sorted and clustered to form spindle poles, thus providing balanced forces for faithful chromosome segregation. To assess the impact of aMTOCs biogenesis on spindle assembly, we genetically induced their precocious fragmentation in mouse oocytes using conditional overexpression of Plk4, a master MTOC regulator. Excessive microtubule nucleation from these fragmented aMTOCs accelerated spindle assembly dynamics. Prematurely formed spindles promoted the breakage of three different fragilized bivalents, generated by the presence of recombined Lox P sites. Reducing the density of microtubules diminished the extent of chromosome breakage. Thus, improper spindle forces can lead to widely described yet unexplained chromosomal structural anomalies with disruptive consequences on the ability of the gamete to transmit an uncorrupted genome.
- University of Southampton United Kingdom
- Biomolécules : Conception, Isolement, Synthèse France
- French National Centre for Scientific Research France
- UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON
- Collège de France France
7 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average