Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Cell Biology Interna...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cell Biology International
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Differential expression of LeY and fucosyltransferase IV correlates with the receptivity of RL95‐2 and HEC‐1A human uterine epithelial cells

Authors: Dongmei Zhang; Qiu Yan; Shuai Liu; Xuesong Yang; Xiao Qi Wang; Jianxin Wei; Jiao Wang;

Differential expression of LeY and fucosyltransferase IV correlates with the receptivity of RL95‐2 and HEC‐1A human uterine epithelial cells

Abstract

AbstractAdhesion molecules expressed on the uterine endometrium are potential receptive markers in embryo implantation. RL95‐2 and HEC‐1A cell lines represent the high‐ and low‐receptive endometrial epithelium respectively. LeY (Lewis Y) is a difucosylated oligosaccharide highly expressed in the endometrium of some species during implantation. α1, 3 fucosylation of LeY is catalysed by FUT4 (fucosyltransferase IV), the key synthesis enzyme for LeY. We investigated whether the difference in receptivity between the 2 cell lines was related to different expressions of LeY and FUT4. RL95‐2 cells expressed a higher level of LeY and FUT4 than HEC‐1A cells, as shown by immunofluorescent staining, RT—PCR (reverse transcription—PCR) or Western blotting. FUT4‐siRNA (small interfering RNA) transfection down‐regulated FUT4 and LeY in RL95‐2 cells, and inhibited the adhesion of the embryonic cells (JAR) to RL95‐2 cell monolayer. FUT4‐cDNA, however, increased the expression of FUT4 and LeY in HEC‐1A cells, and increased the adhesion of embryonic cells to HEC‐1A cell monolayer. Alterations of LeY level by up‐ or down‐regulation of FUT4 also mediated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)/MAPK (mitogen‐activated protein kinase) signalling pathway. To conclude, the expression of LeY and FUT4 correlates with endometrial receptivity, making them potential new markers for the evaluation of endometrial receptivity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

MAP Kinase Signaling System, Lewis X Antigen, Epithelial Cells, Fucosyltransferases, Cell Line, ErbB Receptors, Endometrium, Lewis Blood Group Antigens, Cell Adhesion, Humans, Female, RNA Interference, Embryo Implantation, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Adhesion Molecules

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%