Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Cancer
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Mutation in the DNA‐binding domain of the EWS‐Oct‐4 oncogene results in dominant negative activity that interferes with EWS‐Oct‐4‐mediated transactivation

Authors: Kim, S Kim, Sol; Lee, J Lee, Jungwoon; Kim, JY Kim, Ja Young; Lim, B Lim, Bobae; Shin, EK Shin, Eung-Kyun; Han, YM Han, Yong Mahn; Kim, SS Kim, Sung-Su; +2 Authors

Mutation in the DNA‐binding domain of the EWS‐Oct‐4 oncogene results in dominant negative activity that interferes with EWS‐Oct‐4‐mediated transactivation

Abstract

AbstractThe EWS‐Oct‐4 protein is a chimeric molecule in which the amino terminal domain (NTD) of the EWS becomes fused to the carboxy terminal domain (CTD) of the Oct‐4 transcription factor. It was identified in human bone and soft‐tissue tumors associated with t(6;22)(p21;q12). Using in vitro and in vivo systems, we found that the EWS‐Oct‐4 protein self‐associates. The major domains required for self‐association mapped to the EWS NTD (amino acids 70–163) and the POU DNA‐binding domain. EWS‐Oct‐4 protein also associated with EWS‐Oct‐4 (V351P), which contains a mutation in the POU DNA‐binding domain. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we found that the EWS‐Oct‐4 (V351P) mutant interfered with wild‐type EWS‐Oct‐4 DNA‐binding activity. In addition, we found that EWS‐Oct‐4‐mediated transcriptional activation was inhibited by EWS‐Oct‐4 (V351P) protein in vivo. Thus, this mutation in the POU DNA‐binding domain results in a dominant negative protein. These findings suggest that the biological functions of the EWS‐Oct‐4 oncogene can be modulated by the dominant negative mutant EWS‐Oct‐4 (V351P). © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords

Transcriptional Activation, 572, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, DNA, Oncogenes, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Humans, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6, RNA-Binding Protein EWS, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, DNA Primers, Genes, Dominant

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average